<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>brandXpress blog &#187; Famous Brands</title> <atom:link href="http://www.brandxpress.net/category/famous-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.brandxpress.net</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Gap To Review Its Brand Strategy</title><link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/gap-to-review-its-brand-strategy/</link> <comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/gap-to-review-its-brand-strategy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:16:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Famous Brands]]></category> <category><![CDATA[brand strategy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gap inc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rebranding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[retail]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sales]]></category> <category><![CDATA[takeover]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/gap-to-review-its-brand-strategy/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Gap, the company that helped make khaki beige a fashion statement, is to review its Gap and Old Navy brands after the retailer revealed disappointing sales in December and expected increased pressure in January.Total sales for December were down by 10% on results posted two years ago, at $2.34bn. The company has been in the middle of a two-year rebranding operation but has admitted it has failed and will review its strategy at the two divisions.
No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gap, the company that helped make khaki beige a fashion statement, is to review its Gap and Old Navy brands after the retailer revealed disappointing sales in December and expected increased pressure in January.Total sales for December were down by 10% on results posted two years ago, at $2.34bn. The company has been in the middle of a two-year rebranding operation but has admitted it has failed and will review its strategy at the two divisions.</p><p>Gap has suffered in recent years and each new set of financial results have brought new problems as the San Francisco retailer finds competitors have emulated its essential casual style of T-shirts and khakis and at a cheaper price.</p><p>Alternative strategic decision, helped by ongoing speculation in the market, is that Gap Inc. is ever closer to a takeover is being stoked by a news report that  the struggling retailer has hired the investment firm Goldman Sachs to consider  such offers or other dramatic changes.</p><p>A story to follow&#8230;</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/gap-to-review-its-brand-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Origins of a Historical Brand Image</title><link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/06/the-origins-of-a-historical-brand-image/</link> <comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/06/the-origins-of-a-historical-brand-image/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Famous Brands]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://neamu.sme.ro/?p=185</guid> <description><![CDATA[Part of the 100 most famous and influencing pictures in history, the Marlboro man image has an interesting story: This is C.H. Long, a 39-year-old foreman at the JA ranch in the Texas panhandle, a place described as “320,000 acres of nothing much.” Once a week, Long would ride into town for a store-bought shave [...]
Related posts:<ol><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/08/4-steps-for-creating-a-brand-image/' rel='bookmark' title='4 Steps for Creating a Brand Image'>4 Steps for Creating a Brand Image</a> <small>Your brand image makes people think in a certain way...</small></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the <a
href="http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/lm_index.html">100 most famous and influencing pictures</a> in history, the Marlboro man image has an interesting story:</p><blockquote><p>This is C.H. Long, a 39-year-old foreman at the JA ranch in the Texas panhandle, a place described as “320,000 acres of nothing much.” Once a week, Long would ride into town for a store-bought shave and a milk shake. Maybe he’d take in a movie if a western was playing. He said things like, “If it weren’t for a good horse, a woman would be the sweetest thing in the world.” He rolled his own smokes. When the cowboy’s face and story appeared in LIFE in 1949, advertising exec Leo Burnett had an inspiration. The company Philip Morris, which had introduced Marlboro as a woman’s cigarette in 1924, was seeking a new image for the brand, and the Marlboro Man based on Long boosted Marlboro to the top of the worldwide cigarette market.</p></blockquote><p>Via the excellent <a
href="http://blog.coolz0r.com/2006/06/15/how-marlboro-became-marlboro/">Coolz0r &#8211; Marketing Thoughts</a></p><p>Related posts:<ol><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/08/4-steps-for-creating-a-brand-image/' rel='bookmark' title='4 Steps for Creating a Brand Image'>4 Steps for Creating a Brand Image</a> <small>Your brand image makes people think in a certain way...</small></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/06/the-origins-of-a-historical-brand-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>AT&amp;T New Logo</title><link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/11/att-new-logo/</link> <comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/11/att-new-logo/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Famous Brands]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://neamu.sme.ro/?p=113</guid> <description><![CDATA[The recent unveiling of the at&#38;t (sort of) new logo created quite a buzz online and not only. And it doesn&#8217;t look to be a very good one as the opininons are spreading from whatever to it sucks. I have to admit I tend to agree with the last. I don&#8217;t like it. It&#8217;s just [...]
Related posts:<ol><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/06/how-to-create-a-logo/' rel='bookmark' title='How to Create a Logo'>How to Create a Logo</a> <small>Ideally, your company logo enhances potential customers and partners' crucial...</small></li><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/02/logo-as-part-of-brand-strategy/' rel='bookmark' title='Logo as Part of Brand Strategy'>Logo as Part of Brand Strategy</a> <small>The problem is that the logo is not understood by...</small></li><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/05/whats-in-a-logo/' rel='bookmark' title='What&#8217;s in a logo?'>What&#8217;s in a logo?</a> <small>Logos can be one of the most effective tools for...</small></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent unveiling of the at&amp;t (sort of) new logo created quite a <a
href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;q=at%26t+new+logo&amp;btnG=Search+Blogs">buzz online</a> and not only. And it doesn&#8217;t look to be a very good one as the opininons are spreading from <em>whatever</em> to <em><a
href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008697.html">it sucks</a></em>. I have to admit I tend to agree with the last. I don&#8217;t like it.</p><p>It&#8217;s just a basic example of what I talked about in my <a
href="http://brandxpress.blogspot.com/2005/11/re-branding-not-always-answer.html">previous post</a>: re-branding with no particular reason. Challanging customers, just to see if they can follow your periodic rebranding efforts.</p><p>Short history: last year Cingular snapped up AT&amp;T Wireless, which had been spun off from AT&amp;T in 2001. They then spent the better part of the past year spending tons of time and money trying to eliminate the AT&amp;T Wireless brand and integrate its network, subscribers, and services into Cingular. The integration is pretty much done, but now they’re going to go through all that again, except in reverse, which means that some of you out there will go from being AT&amp;T Wireless subcribers, to Cingular subscribers, only to become AT&amp;T Wireless subscribers all over again.</p><p>I bet they needed a pricy branding agency advicing them into this strategy (rumors say <a
href="http://www.underconsideration.com/speakup/archives/002478.html#002478">Interbrand</a>).</p><p>Well as this wasn&#8217;t enough, while the AT&amp;T old name was (and I agree) a valuable one, the old logo wasn&#8217;t &#8220;trendy&#8221; anymore. So the agency put up a memo convincing the AT&amp;T guys that the old logo needs a re-work, &#8220;aimed at freshening up the brand&#8221;. The globe is getting a third transparent dimension. Capitals are turned to lowercases, having <em>it&#8217;s more trendy and modern</em> as an <a
href="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/laszlo/archives/012054.html">argument</a>:<br
/><blockquote>Lowercase type is now used for the “AT&amp;T” characters because it projects a more welcoming and accessible image.</p></blockquote><p>Well I tend to agree more with Russel on <a
href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008697.html">this one</a>:<br
/><blockquote>Lowercase is a horrible choice, though I’m sure some branding company out there sold the choice as adding a “new, youthful” appearance or something (a perfect choice for the name’s 110 year history). Secondly, the fact it’s not bold makes the letters themselves less of a logomark, so now you *need* to have the globe-thing next to the letters or you lose the whole branding.</p></blockquote><p>Further readings:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.sbc.com/gen/general?pid=6756">at&amp;t brand center</a><br
/> <a
href="http://www.sbc.com/Common/files/pdf/logo_evolution_factsheet.pdf">Evolutionary chart of logo (PDF)</a><br
/> <a
href="http://www.sbc.com/gen/pess-room?pid=7521">New logo formats</a></p><p>Tag: <span
class="removed_link" title="http://del.icio.us/brandxpress/logo">logo</span>, <span
class="removed_link" title="http://del.icio.us/brandxpress/rebranding">rebranding</span>, <span
class="removed_link" title="http://del.icio.us/brandxpress/re-branding">re-branding</span></p><p>Related posts:<ol><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/06/how-to-create-a-logo/' rel='bookmark' title='How to Create a Logo'>How to Create a Logo</a> <small>Ideally, your company logo enhances potential customers and partners' crucial...</small></li><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/02/logo-as-part-of-brand-strategy/' rel='bookmark' title='Logo as Part of Brand Strategy'>Logo as Part of Brand Strategy</a> <small>The problem is that the logo is not understood by...</small></li><li><a
href='http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/05/whats-in-a-logo/' rel='bookmark' title='What&#8217;s in a logo?'>What&#8217;s in a logo?</a> <small>Logos can be one of the most effective tools for...</small></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2005/11/att-new-logo/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
