<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brandXpress blog &#187; competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandxpress.net/tag/competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandxpress.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Branding Is? What Branding Is Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2008/11/what-branding-is-what-branding-is-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2008/11/what-branding-is-what-branding-is-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsupported claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think of your brand as a promise ... a promise you make to your clients, prospects, employees, and even your vendors. But before you make that promise, be sure you never forget this fact. It is imperative that you are able to back it up. You cannot build a successful, long-term brand on unsupported claims and wishful thinking. History is littered with companies -- big and small -- that have promoted themselves or their products as something they would like to have lived up to but could not.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post on the subject at <a href="http://branding-management.blogspot.com/2008/11/branding-single-most-important-thing.html" target="_blank">Branding Management</a>:</p>
<p><em>Think of your brand as a promise &#8230; a promise you make to your clients, prospects, employees, and even your vendors. But before you make that promise, be sure you never forget this fact. It is imperative that you are able to back it up. You cannot build a successful, long-term brand on unsupported claims and wishful thinking. History is littered with companies &#8212; big and small &#8212; that have promoted themselves or their products as something they would like to have lived up to but could not.</em></p>
<p><em>To separate you from your competition, your brand &#8212; your promise &#8212; has to differentiate you from others in the minds of your prospects. This is the reason you cannot use quality, integrity, or price when positioning yourself in your marketplace. So many companies claim to offer these particular characteristics that none of them stand out from the others. BMW has taken note of this. Although it is thought by many to be the best car made, the company has built its brand as &#8220;a driving machine.&#8221; It sells the experience. BMW knows that there are other high quality cars on the market, so a brand built on quality would be diluted and therefore, less profitable.</em></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2008/11/what-branding-is-what-branding-is-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Rules to Establish and Maintain Brand Awareness</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/11/5-rules-to-establish-and-maintain-brand-awarness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/11/5-rules-to-establish-and-maintain-brand-awarness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/11/5-rules-to-establish-and-maintain-brand-awarness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that the hot ways to enhance your brand involve new media, business branding basics are still in style. Branding success will depend on adapting to the rapidly evolving media environment and taking advantage of new opportunities to reach your target audience.

But, there are some branding constants that will remain critical for establishing and maintaining brand awareness with your target audience. Regardless of the medium chosen for distribution, you must:


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the fact that the hot ways to enhance your brand involve new media, business branding basics are still in style. Branding success will depend on adapting to the rapidly evolving media environment and taking advantage of new opportunities to reach your target audience.</p>
<p>But, there are some branding constants that will remain critical for establishing and maintaining brand awareness with your target audience. Regardless of the medium chosen for distribution, you must: <span id="more-259"></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Ensure your brand promise is clear</strong>. Be simple, be direct, and by all means, be consistent.</li>
<li><strong>Focus on creating a well-conceived brand name</strong>. Even the cleverest branding strategy will fall flat if the name you seek to brand is poorly conceived.</li>
<li><strong>Understand the competition.</strong> No one operates in a vacuum. While originality is important, it’s critical to be aware of your competitors’ branding strategies.</li>
<li><strong>Set branding goals</strong>. You can’t very well determine your success if you don’t have a benchmark against which to measure it. Know where you want to go and when you want to get there.</li>
<li><strong>Remain committed yet flexible</strong>. Branding success doesn’t occur overnight; it takes commitment to maintain focus and build loyalty. But that doesn’t mean strategy changes might not be necessary along the way, so be open to tweaking your approach as necessary.</li>
</ul>
<p>Read more in the <a href="http://Entrepreneur.com">Entrepreneur.com</a> article <a href="http://www.entrepreneur.com/marketing/branding/imageandbrandingcolumnistjohnwilliams/article169848.html">Branding Trends: Delivery Channels Take the Lead</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/11/5-rules-to-establish-and-maintain-brand-awarness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brand &#8211; Key Factor For Customers When Choosing a Wireless Service</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/brand-key-factor-for-customers-when-choosing-a-wireless-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/brand-key-factor-for-customers-when-choosing-a-wireless-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer satisfaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless carrier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/brand-key-factor-for-customers-when-choosing-a-wireless-service/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the summed importance of branding (of the carrier and the phone) in purchasing decision seems to remain constant at a total of 59% it is worth noticing that 19 percent of customers cite the type or brand of cell phone as a key factor during the initial process of selecting a wireless service, up from 11 percent in 2004. While the brand of wireless provider is still the most popular reason influencing the initial selection process, it has decreased significantly in importance, down 8 percentage points from 2004 to 40 percent in 2006.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brand and brand name is the key factor for customer when choosing a wireless service. What&#8217;s interesting in the J.D. Power and Associates 2006 Wireless Retail Sales Satisfaction StudySM whose Volume 2 was released today &#8211; is that the customers are increasingly influenced by the handset when selecting a wireless service.</p>
<p>While the summed importance of branding (of the carrier and the phone) in purchasing decision seems to remain constant at a total of 59% it is worth noticing that 19 percent of customers cite the type or brand of cell phone as a key factor during the initial process of selecting a wireless service, up from 11 percent in 2004. While the brand of wireless provider is still the most popular reason influencing the initial selection process, it has decreased significantly in importance, down 8 percentage points from 2004 to 40 percent in 2006.<br />
<span id="more-257"></span><br />
Other key factors that influence the initial selection process are price/promotion (29%) and retail location (12%).</p>
<p>While this strategy is adopted due to high competition in the field, I honestly don&#8217;t find it sustainable on the long term because promoting the cell phone instead of the service plan and the carrier that provides that service may lead to sales growth in the short term, but it can potentially have a negative long term impact with higher churn rates.</p>
<p>The study actually shows this. As such, among customers who are most influenced by the cell phone brand, the likelihood of switching carriers in the next 12-month period is 60 percent higher than among customers who cite the brand of the wireless provider as their key factor in the selection process.</p>
<p>On the other hand study shows that among major wireless carrier-owned retail stores, T-Mobile ranks highest in customer satisfaction for a fourth consecutive reporting period. T-Mobile receives particularly high ratings in all four factors that determine overall satisfaction. T-Mobile is followed in the rankings by Verizon Wireless and Alltel, respectively.</p>
<p>Volume 2 of the 2006 Wireless Retail Sales Satisfaction Study is based on experiences reported by 7,530 wireless users who completed a retail sales transaction within six months prior to being surveyed. The results are from the two most recent reporting waves, which were conducted in April and July 2006. More about the study <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.asp?ID=2006230">here</a>.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/brand-key-factor-for-customers-when-choosing-a-wireless-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eleven Killer Tactics To Create a Strong Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/eleven-killer-tactics-to-create-a-strong-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/eleven-killer-tactics-to-create-a-strong-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual identity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/eleven-killer-tactics-to-create-a-strong-brand/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The strategy is set. You clearly know who you are, you’ve decided on your brand difference, you’ve found folks who want what you have, and you’ve mapped out the great experience you will deliver. Now you must employ the big brand bang and let your message resonate through every point of market contact.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Branding Diva" href="http://www.brandingdiva.com/" target="_blank">Karen Post</a>&#8216;s excellent book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0814472346?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=brandxpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0814472346">Brain Tattoos: Creating Unique Brands That Stick in Your Customers&#8217; Minds</a> is presenting eleven <em>tatoo tactics that speak loudly even when you whisper.</em></p>
<p class="first-para"> </p>
<blockquote><p><em>The strategy is set. You clearly know who you are, you’ve  decided on your brand difference, you’ve found folks who want what you have, and  you’ve mapped out the great experience you will deliver. Now you must employ the  big brand bang and let your message resonate through every point of market  contact.</em></p>
<p class="para"><em>The next step in building your brand is tactical. What specific  weapons are you going to launch, at whom, and with what frequency? How will you  be heard, noticed, and remembered in a crowded, chaotic playing field, possibly  working with less money than your competitors? I refer to this engine as  ‘‘speaking loudly even when you whisper,’’ by which I mean making sure that even  your smallest effort is on target, relevant, and working to build the brand</em>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="para"> </p>
<h3>Tactic 1: Visual Identity</h3>
<p>The footprint of a brand—your corporate identity, graphic system, or visual voice—can take your brand many good places. It can also head you straight into a wall if it does not accurately project what the brand is and consistently stick to the story.<br />
<span id="more-245"></span></p>
<h3>Tactic 2: Advertising</h3>
<p>Advertising can be used to generate leads, sell product, advocate beliefs, persuade, calm unrest, and build brands. Advertising is the act of paying to showcase a message, and more. Advertising gives the brand builder a high-speed lane to the market. On the other hand, it is not immune to falling trees, lightning, bad weather, careless drivers, or an occasional competitor with wings. Smart advertising can fertilize the brand soil and aid in the brand’s growth.</p>
<h3>Tactic 3: Brand Partnerships</h3>
<p>Sometimes two brands are better than one. Collaboration with other brands, vendors, and distribution channels not only adds firepower and reduces costs, but it ultimately can strengthen a brand.</p>
<p>Partnerships can be as simple as two brands co-hosting an event or as formal as an agreement involving new selling channels, co-op ad spending, joint research, and licensing contracts. When choosing any brand partner, you should adhere to an established set of guidelines that complement your brand and meet business goals.</p>
<h3>Tactic 4: Media Relations</h3>
<p>Twenty-four-hour news, free-flowing information, and breaking reports offer vast opportunities to get your brand message out with an added layer of authority and third-party endorsement. Despite the cynics, the media has immense influence on the market.</p>
<p>Organizations that don’t take full advantage of this powerful vehicle will miss sales, stature, and a substantial brand bang.</p>
<h3>Tactic 5: Community Relations</h3>
<p>Community relations encompasses any niche community where having a strong positive relationship is important and valuable to the brand and the market you serve. For many organizations, this includes your category industry and nonprofit interests.</p>
<h3>Tactic 6: Sales Promotions/Events</h3>
<p>Promotions are any activities that stimulate purchasing. Promotions can work well in both consumer markets and the business-to-business space if planned and executed correctly. A great sales promotion can launch new products, reintroduce new and improved ones, clean out an old line or inventory, synergize co-brands, cross-sell among product lines, arouse loyalty, and entice first-time sampling or trial purchases.</p>
<h3>Tactic 7: Customer Service</h3>
<p>Serving customers seems like a simple task, yet many savvy business leaders are blind to the huge service cracks in their business. A crack in service is extremely dangerous. One too many rude encounters, another insensitive act, or a downright bitter battle, and your customer will not only make you history, but his rage can spread like wildfire and burn up even the best brand.</p>
<h3>Tactic 8: Sales</h3>
<p>Selling with brand in hand shortens the distance to the finish line. Selling today is no cakewalk. New products, trillions of choices, and floods of options surround us. Pressure is high, competition is everywhere, and the economy is faltering. So what. Quit your whining. Add some brand to your sales arsenal, and the process gets easier and more effective.</p>
<h3>Tactic 9: The Environment and Merchandising</h3>
<p>Visual seduction is not just for retailers. Merchandising and environmental branding needs more respect. Once thought of as merely decorative displays or point-of-purchase sale stimulators, today merchandising and the environment are a significant brand-building tactic.</p>
<h3>Tactic 10: Online</h3>
<p>Building a brand, one thousand clicks at a time: Online technology has catapulted the brand like no other tactic. The impact on all business sectors and models is immense. Small companies can be global. Virtual stores can operate without inventory. Time to market is condensed to a warp speed, and the customer has more options and choices than ever before. As with every new horizon, there lie vast opportunities and difficult challenges</p>
<h3>Tactic 11: Alternative and Buzz Activities</h3>
<p>Guerrilla or alternative marketing has no rules. The more you can get away with, the better. Such campaigns are nontraditional. They disrupt and surprise. They can be crazy, irreverent, or bizarre, and many times they are extremely potent and effective for a lot less money than the ordinary campaigns</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/eleven-killer-tactics-to-create-a-strong-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Global Brands by Value &#8211; 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/07/best-global-brands-by-value-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/07/best-global-brands-by-value-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neamu.sme.ro/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brand value is calculated as the net present value of the earnings the brand is expected to generate and secure in the future for the time frame from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006. To be considered the brands must have a minimum brand value of US$2.7 billion, achieve about one third of their earnings outside of their home country, have publicly available marketing and financial data, and have a wider public profile beyond their direct customer base.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The previously announced <a href="http://www.interbrand.com">Interbrand</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.businessweek.com">BusinessWeek</a> 2006 Best Global Brands by brand value is finally out with no major movements in the top 10.</p>
<p>Brand value is calculated as the net present value of the earnings the brand is expected to generate and secure in the future for the time frame from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006. To be considered the brands must have a minimum brand value of US$2.7 billion, achieve about one third of their earnings outside of their home country, have publicly available marketing and financial data, and have a wider public profile beyond their direct customer base.</p>
<p><span id="more-206"></span>Here is the list with 2006 top 10 standings:<br />
Rank  Brand      Brand Value ($m)<br />
1(1)  Coca-Cola  67,000<br />
2(2)  Microsoft  56,927<br />
3(3)  IBM        56,201<br />
4(4)  GE         48,907<br />
5(5)  Intel      32,319<br />
6(6)  Nokia      30,131<br />
7(9)  Toyota     27,941<br />
8(7)  Disney     27,848<br />
9(8)  McDonald’s 27,501<br />
10(11)Mercedes   21,795</p>
<p><strong>Top Gainers</strong><br />
The top gainer with a brand value increase of 46%, Google (#24) creates growth under with the strategy of “do no evil” positioning itself at the opposite end of the spectrum from the more corporate Microsoft. Overall growth of Internet commerce has perpetuated consumers’ acceptance of purchasing goods and services online enabling eBay (#47) to skyrocket in value up 18% and the third highest gainer this year.</p>
<p>In the second spot with a value increase of 20%, Starbucks (#91) has found financial success by leveraging the brand with a premium fast food and extending its product offering into music and publishing.</p>
<p><strong>Top Decliners</strong><br />
The growth of mass retailers has taken market share from traditional apparel brands such as Gap (#52). Losing the most brand value with a decline of -22%, Gap has been unable to clarify its brand image and with a less distinct positioning the brand has been less effective at selling clothing causing reduced long-term stability.</p>
<p>Ford (#30) continues to lose money on every car sold – and brand value year after year. Down -16% this year, Ford’s American heritage is an insufficient brand attribute to hold off growing competition from Japanese and German automakers.</p>
<p>Down -12% this year, Kodak (#70) has made valiant strides to catch up with the digital world, however the reality is that competition is fierce and profitability is thin compared to Kodak’s film business and thus the brand’s value continues to decline.</p>
<p>Last year <a href="http://brandxpress.blogspot.com/2005/07/best-global-brands-by-value-for-2005.html">Best Global Brands by Value for 2005</a></p>
<p>Further readings on this:<br />
<a href="http://www.ourfishbowl.com/images/press_releases/IB_Press_Release_BGB06.pdf">Interbrand&#8217;s press release</a><br />
<a href="http://bwnt.businessweek.com/brand/2006/">Business Week article</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/07/best-global-brands-by-value-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Branding Trends in 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/01/key-branding-trends-in-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/01/key-branding-trends-in-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer expectations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neamu.sme.ro/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Passikoff is president/founder of Brand Keys, which has published the Customer Loyalty Index of leading companies in 26 product and service categories since 1996., has an interesting article over at Chief Marketer about what he calls the five key trends that will determine the difference between success and failure for brands and marketers for [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Passikoff is president/founder of Brand Keys, which has published the Customer Loyalty Index of leading companies in 26 product and service categories since 1996., has an interesting article over at <a title="chief marketer" href="http://chiefmarketer.com/">Chief Marketer</a> about what he calls the five key trends that will determine the difference between success and failure for brands and marketers for 2006:</p>
<p><strong>1. An emphasis on “engagement.”</strong><br />
Inserting itself between traditional marketing activities and an increasing demand for return on investment assessments, engagement will become the Holy Grail for marketers and advertisers. Defined as the outcome of ad and marketing activities that substantively increases a brand&#8217;s strength in the eyes of the consumers, engagement will be used more and more to allocate marketing budgets.</p>
<p><strong>2. Using technology to better meet consumer expectations.</strong><br />
Consumer expectations in all categories will continue to grow. Expectations have increased more than 26% in the past five years while brands have kept up with these expectations by only 8%! Watch for smart marketers to take advantage of unfulfilled expectations via such values as &#8220;convenience&#8221; and &#8220;customization.&#8221; More and more marketers will rely upon Web sites and high-tech capabilities to accommodate these values and differentiate themselves from the competition. Professional services and other non-traditional brands will probably take advantage of the new technologies and start build up brands for themselves.</p>
<p><strong>3. Expanding the potential of Websites and blogs</strong><br />
Engagement concerns and attempts to meet or exceed customer expectations will fuse and be most observed online, particularly on blogs. Watch for increased development of blogs and Websites in general beyond propaganda, information, and use as an electronic cash register toward the creation of &#8220;communities of ones.”</p>
<p><strong>4. “Recombinant” experiences.</strong><br />
Disney and Vegas: Oil and water? Consumer values indicate a bipolar continuum for recombinant experiences. Watch for this to reveal itself in more online gaming, especially for adults. Interactive gaming with more and more players being able to compete at once will become table stakes for online games. Marketers concerned with engagement will close their eyes to &#8220;appropriateness&#8221; and leverage online gaming as a more acceptable venue for virtually every brand.</p>
<p><strong>5. More branded entertainment.</strong><br />
Popular culture, with its rabid consumption of music and technology, will see market and brand leaders leverage plugging-in as a method for customizing entertainment and selling products. For instance, music-related paraphernalia such as T-shirts, posters, and artist-related merchandise will infringe more and more on the dominance of bricks-and mortar retail.</p>
<p>Read full article <a href="http://chiefmarketer.com/cm_report/branding_in_2006_12132005/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/branding+trends">branding trends</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/blogs">blogs</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/branded+entretainment">branded entretainment</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/01/key-branding-trends-in-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluate Your Name</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/01/evaluate-your-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/01/evaluate-your-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[association names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word-of-mouth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neamu.sme.ro/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When re-branding a business or a product or when you set up a new one and have to come up with a brand new name you should find a way to evaluate among different options that might come up in order to choose the best one out of them. Here I just stumble upon and [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When re-branding a business or a product or when you set up a new one and have to come up with a brand new name you should find a way to evaluate among different options that might come up in order to choose the best one out of them. Here I just stumble upon and interesting tool  to dissect potential names into the nine categories to make it easier to understand why name work or don&#8217;t work, and to more easily weigh the pros and cons of one name versus another:</p>
<p><strong>Appearance</strong> &#8211; Simply how the name looks as a visual signifier, in a logo, an ad, on a billboard, etc.</p>
<p><strong>Distinctive</strong> &#8211; How differentiated is a given name from its competition. Being distinctive is only one element that goes into making a name memorable, but it is a required element, since if a name is not distinct from a sea of similar names it will not be memorable.</p>
<p><strong>Depth</strong> &#8211; Layer upon layer of meaning and association. Names with great depth never reveal all they have to offer all at once, but keep surprising you with new ideas.</p>
<p><strong>Energy</strong> &#8211; How vital and full of life is the name? Does it have buzz? Can it carry an ad campaign on its shoulders?</p>
<p><strong>Humanity</strong> &#8211; A measure of a name&#8217;s warmth, its &#8220;humanness,&#8221; as opposed to names that are cold, clinical, unemotional. Another &#8211; though not foolproof &#8211; way to think about this category is to imagine each of the names as a nickname for one of your children.</p>
<p><strong>Positioning</strong> &#8211; How relevant the name is to the positioning of the product or company being named, the service offered, or to the industry served.</p>
<p><strong>Sound</strong> &#8211; Again, while always existing in a context of some sort or another, the name <strong>will</strong> be heard, in radio or television commercials, being presented at a trade show, or simply being discussed in a cocktail party conversation.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;33&#8243;</strong> &#8211; The force of brand magic, and the word-of-mouth buzz that a name is likely to generate. Refers to the mysterious &#8220;33&#8243; printed on the back of Rolling Rock beer bottles for decades that everybody talks about because nobody is really sure what it means. &#8220;33&#8243; is that certain something that makes people lean forward and want to learn more about a brand, and to want to share the brand with others. The &#8220;33&#8243; angle is different for each name.</p>
<p><strong>Trademark</strong> &#8211; As in the ugly, meat hook reality of trademark availability. All of the names on this list have been prescreened by a trademarked attorney and have been deemed &#8220;likely&#8221; for trademark registration.</p>
<p>Read more about it <a title="name evaluation" href="http://www.igorinternational.com/process/name-evaluation-brand-evaluate-names.php">here</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/01/evaluate-your-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
