<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brandXpress blog &#187; name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandxpress.net/tag/name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandxpress.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Key Brand Elements</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2008/11/key-brand-elements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2008/11/key-brand-elements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elements of a brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were probably said before, one way or another all across this blog, and not only. I just feel the need to remind them and put them in a structure. No brand can live without them, all efficient brands have them. The most important elements of a brand should be:Brand Position, Brand promise, brand personality, brand story, brand association


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bold style1">There were probably mentioned before, one way or another all across this blog, and not only. I just feel the need to remind them and put them in a structure. No brand can live without them, all efficient brands have them.</p>
<p class="bold style1">The most important elements of a brand should be:</p>
<p class="bold style1"><a href="http://www.brandxpress.net/category/positioning/" target="_self"><strong>Brand Position</strong></a></p>
<ul class="style1">
<li>Who is addressed by company&#8217;s branded products or services. What the company does and for whom</li>
<li>The company&#8217;s unique value and how customers benefit from products and/or services</li>
<li>Key competitive differentiators, what makes the brand be chosen, be different from its competitors</li>
</ul>
<p class="bold style1"><a href="http://www.brandxpress.net/search-results/?cx=partner-pub-8677760062540097:vgumck-lpvw&amp;cof=FORID:11&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=brand+promise&amp;sa=Search" target="_self"><strong>Brand Promise</strong></a></p>
<ul class="style1">
<li>The ONE most important thing that the brand promises to deliver to its customers — Every time!</li>
<li>What customers and partners should expect from every interaction, how should they feel as brand&#8217;s customers</li>
</ul>
<p class="bold style1"><strong>Brand Personality</strong></p>
<ul class="style1">
<li>What the brand is to be known for</li>
<li>Personality traits that customers, partners, and employees use to describe the company. What comes to the (potential) customer&#8217;s mind when addressed about the brand</li>
</ul>
<p class="bold style1"><strong>Brand Story</strong></p>
<ul class="style1">
<li>The company&#8217;s history and how the history adds value and credibility to the brand</li>
<li>A summary of products/services/solutions</li>
</ul>
<p class="bold style1"><strong>Brand Associations</strong></p>
<ul class="style1">
<li>Physical artifacts: name, logo, colors, taglines, fonts, imagery</li>
<li>Ideally, it must reflect the all the above statements about the brand and the company</li>
</ul>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2008/11/key-brand-elements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Band Branding</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/10/band-branding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/10/band-branding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Co-Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/10/band-branding/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting article in NY Times, couple of days ago, on how (co) branding and nowadays marketing strategies had changed the way music industry is running its business. It is focused especially on names and bands "whose generation embraced the anti-big-business motto â€œnever trust anyone over 30â€ in the 1960s, toots the corporate horn" nowadays.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting article in NY Times, couple of days ago, on how (co) branding and nowadays marketing strategies had changed the way music industry is running its business. It is focused especially on names and bands &#8220;whose generation embraced the anti-big-business motto â€œnever trust anyone over 30â€ in the 1960s, toots the corporate horn&#8221; nowadays.</p>
<blockquote><p>Band branding appears to know no bounds. The Black Crowes market rolling papers, Bon Jovi offers $1,000 signed canvas art prints and MÃ¶tley CrÃ¼e peddled MÃ¶tley BrÃ¼e, a carbonated drink. Celebration Cellars, a California winemaker, teamed up with several rockers, including Bon Jovi, Kiss, Madonna and the Rolling Stones, to issue special-edition  wines that feature band logos and sell for $100 or more a bottle.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>branding lucre rolling in for those who do choose to indulge, some record labels are pressuring artists to share their promotional and merchandising income as a condition of getting record contracts â€” so-called 360 deals.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-291"></span><br />
Read full <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/business/28rockers.html?pagewanted=1&amp;ei=5088&amp;en=f8d8a12373c98aed&amp;ex=1351224000&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">If Itâ€™s Retail, Is It Still Rock?</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/10/band-branding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 &#8211; Interesting Year Start in Brands and Branding</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/2007-interesting-year-start-in-brands-and-branding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/2007-interesting-year-start-in-brands-and-branding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re-Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cingular wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/2007-interesting-year-start-in-brands-and-branding/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple Computers who dropped computer from its name. The move is rather normal considering that iPod or iTunes are two of the main products of Apple Inc. and was announced in the same time with the buzzy launching of iPhone. Now, getting to this, cannot help myself not to admire the Apple capacity to create a buzz in the media, no matter that we're talking about the internet of the classic mass media. The phone they launched is, I admit, a work of art and has a lot of great features but I wouldn't hurry to name it neither a Blackberry killer, a computer or a smart phone. It's more like a beautifully designed, big brand sustained swiss knife of mobiles.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 definitely started with a lot of agitation in some of the big brands courtyard.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d start with the Apple Computers who dropped  <em>computer</em> from its name. The move is rather normal considering that iPod or iTunes are two of the main products of Apple Inc. and was announced in the same time with the buzzy launching of iPhone. Now, getting to this, cannot help myself not to admire the Apple capacity to create a buzz in the media, no matter that we&#8217;re talking about the internet of the classic mass media. The phone they launched is, I admit, a work of art and has a lot of great features but I wouldn&#8217;t hurry to name it neither a Blackberry killer, a computer or a smart phone. It&#8217;s more like a beautifully designed, big brand sustained swiss knife of mobiles.</p>
<p><span id="more-266"></span>Anyway, the iPhone road is not clear yet, at least in terms of naming and branding as Cisco sued Apple over the name itself considering they are marketing a VOIP phone with the same name for quite a while now. I wonder on this what made Steve Jobs go on with the name at the Macworld conference: the trust in the Apple brand power to impose the iPhone on the market (along with its previous similar names products: iPod, iTunes or iMac) or the time pressure of the launch. There were even rumors (not confirmed after all) that they already changed the name to iTouch Mobile. Well not yet.</p>
<p>Speaking about Apple&#8217;s phone, is worth mentioning its (two years in advanced blindly signed) exclusivity distribution contract with Cingular. And coming to this is also worth mentioning that AT&amp;T launched its largest-ever ad campaign yesterday geared toward absorbing Cingular Wireless into the AT&amp;T brand. More than that. AT&amp;T will also be launching a campaign to rebrand BellSouth as AT&amp;T. AT&amp;T acquired BellSouth for $80 billion in December &#8211; the largest telecommunications merger in U.S. history. Cingular was a joint property of AT&amp;T and BellSouth. Now that&#8217;s a huge rebranding effort to follow.</p>
<p>Citigroup, the global banking giant, is shrinking its name. Executives are prepared to rebrand the company &#8220;Citi&#8221; and to fold up its familiar red umbrella and instead use a logo with a stylized arc above the name. The design is similar to the &#8220;citi&#8221; logo that now appears on much of its consumer advertising, office buildings and credit cards. A rollout could begin as early as next month.</p>
<p>Pepsi is introducing 35 different packaging designs as part of a global brand revamp aimed at bringing younger consumers closer to the brand. It is only the 11th time the brand has changed its look in its 109-year history. 					 					 						The graphics, created by US agencies, will use themes associated with teens and young adults. Looking to get a little extra pop out of its sponsorship of the Super Bowl XLI  Halftime Show, Pepsi announced it is giving away a jewel-encrusted Pepsi can  valued at $100,000 as well as Super Bowl tickets for life.</p>
<p>Now, getting to the soon to come Super Bowl and <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html">Time Magazine person of the year 2006</a>, just found via <a href="http://www.churchofthecustomer.com/blog/2007/01/amateur_superbo.html">Church of the Customer Blog</a> an interesting initiative of some advertisers that have <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116856806277874702-OkHgzhxdPanmQWT8IiormBEShTc_20080112.html">jumped on</a> the citizen-created bandwagon by inviting everyday people to help create their ads.   Lining up are <a href="http://intranet.edventurepartners.com/samprograms/chevrolet_sb/default.asp">Chevrolet,</a> <a href="http://promotions.yahoo.com/doritos/">Doritos</a>, and the <a href="http://www.nfl.com/superad">NFL</a>. The contests for Chevy and the NFL are to submit <em>ideas</em> for commercials, not actual videos. Winning ideas are made into ads by professional agencies.</p>
<p>And, in the end, since I got next to sports, even though I&#8217;m planning a separate blog post on this, it has to be mentioned as an important start-of-the-year-branding-event and a subject follow, the multi-million dollar Beckham brand relocation in USA.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2007/01/2007-interesting-year-start-in-brands-and-branding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Reasons to Brand Your Business</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/7-reasons-to-brand-your-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/7-reasons-to-brand-your-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/7-reasons-to-brand-your-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A business without a brand name is like a product that does not have a name. You’ve got to ensure a high impact branding strategy that will help your customer to remember you, your products and your services. In this case, it is your articles and your quality of writing are what should be remembered the most.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A business without a brand name is like a product that does not have a name. You’ve got to ensure a high impact branding strategy that will help your customer to remember you, your products and your services. In this case, it is your articles and your quality of writing are what should be remembered the most.</p>
<p><a title="Why You must brand your name" href="http://www.jasonoickle.com/archives/29">Jason</a> has put up a list of 7 reasons why you should brand your name:</p>
<ol>
<li>Branding creates product awareness</li>
<li>Branding can relay your product’s performance.</li>
<li>Branding is your mark as the maker.</li>
<li>Name branding ensures your customers will remember you.</li>
<li>Branding completes your overall marketing strategy.</li>
<li>Branding makes marketing so much easier.</li>
<li>Branding promotes sales.</li>
</ol>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/7-reasons-to-brand-your-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain&#8217;s Oldest Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/britains-oldest-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/britains-oldest-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guinness book of records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/britains-oldest-brand/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lyle's Golden Syrup has been named as Britain's oldest brand, with its green and gold packaging having remained almost unchanged since 1885. The Guinness Book of Records gave the breakfast and teatime sweetener, whose tins bear the image of a lion and a biblical quotation, the prized honor.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyle&#8217;s Golden Syrup has been named as Britain&#8217;s oldest brand, with its green and gold packaging having remained almost unchanged since 1885. The Guinness Book of Records gave the breakfast and teatime sweetener, whose tins bear the image of a lion and a biblical quotation, the prized honor.</p>
<p>The syrup came into being as a by-product of sugar refined by Scottish businessman Abram Lyle in London. It was first stored in tins in 1885 &#8211; a million tins are now produced monthly.</p>
<p>Read the BBC story <a title="BBC" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5388020.stm">here</a>.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brandxpress.net/2006/10/britains-oldest-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
